After reviewing the Christianity Today article in your assigned reading for Tuesday, post your thoughts on how Woodberry’s research (though he is a sociologist) demonstrates what historians do as described in chapter one of Fea. Also, how this is an example of “revisionist history” and how you think it might be further revised by future scholarship. And, do you see any ways that a historian might differ with a sociologist in their approach to this topic?

Your initial post should be around 250-400 words.